National headlines about criminal justice reform in 2026 tell a story of accelerating bipartisan progress at the state level: more reform laws passed in 2025 than in 2024, and a growing list of policy changes that reformers describe as achievable. The Prison Policy Initiative’s annual guide to winnable reforms identifies 34 specific changes across eight categories that states have already enacted or are positioned to enact in 2026.
That national story is real. But Texas defendants reading those headlines should understand that their state is not the model being cited and, in several significant respects, Texas is moving in the opposite direction. A clear-eyed look at what is actually changing in Texas, what the national reform agenda includes, and where the two intersect is more useful than a general optimism that reform is coming.
The National Picture: Reform Accelerating Despite Federal Pullback
The Prison Policy Initiative’s 2026 reform guide was published against a backdrop it describes plainly: hard-won criminal justice reforms are under coordinated attack by the Trump administration, Congress, and some state-level politicians determined to return to 1990s-era tough-on-crime approaches. Despite that federal pressure, state legislatures across the country continued passing reform legislation through 2024 and 2025.
The 34 reforms PPI identifies for 2026 fall into eight categories: expanding alternatives to criminal legal system responses; protecting the presumption of innocence; decreasing the length of prison sentences; treating people humanely during incarceration; treating people on community supervision fairly; setting people up to succeed after release; giving incarcerated and formerly incarcerated people political representation; and reducing spending on the criminal legal system while increasing investments in communities.
For defendants and defense attorneys, the most immediately relevant categories are the first two: alternatives to incarceration and presumption of innocence protections. These are the reforms most likely to affect case outcomes directly whether through diversion programs that route defendants away from the standard criminal process, or through bail and pretrial detention reforms that reduce the penalty defendants pay simply by being charged.
What Texas Actually Did in 2025
The 2025 Texas legislative session produced a mixed picture with the balance tilting toward increased penalties rather than reform.
Bail reform — more restrictive, not less. The session’s most significant criminal justice legislation was a sweeping bail reform package that was a longtime priority of Governor Abbott. Senate Joint Resolution 5, which Texas voters will have the final say on, would amend the Texas Constitution to require judges to deny bail in certain cases involving specific violent felonies. Senate Bill 9 limits who is eligible for cashless bonds. The stated goal is keeping violent repeat offenders behind bars pretrial but bail reform that restricts release rather than expanding it runs directly counter to the national reform trend.
One reform that passed for defendants: HB 413. House Bill 413 prohibits the pretrial detention of a defendant for longer than the maximum sentence they could receive if convicted. This is a meaningful protection. It prevents the situation where someone charged with a low-level offense sits in jail for months awaiting trial despite facing a maximum sentence of days or weeks. It does not apply to defendants held for mental health evaluations.
Prison education. Senate Bill 2405 allows post-secondary education responsibilities in Texas prisons to be transferred to Windham School District, enabling data-sharing agreements to measure the impact of educational programming. This supports reentry outcomes and reflects a bipartisan consensus that education during incarceration reduces recidivism.
Penalty increases, not reductions. Texas lawmakers proposed more than 120 bills to increase criminal penalties in the 2025 session, including proposals to create mandatory minimum sentences and elevate punishments for a range of offenses. In 2023, Texas created 58 new criminal offenses which was more than in any of the previous ten legislative sessions. The 2025 session continued that trend with enhanced penalties for organized retail crime and other targeted areas.
Where the National Reform Agenda Touches Texas Directly
Several of the reforms identified by the Prison Policy Initiative as achievable in 2026 have specific Texas implications worth understanding.
Driver’s license suspension reform. The PPI report specifically identifies Texas as a state that should formally opt out of the federal automatic license suspension law that currently requires Texas to suspend licenses for drug offenses unrelated to driving. Twenty states and the District of Columbia have already eliminated driver’s license suspension for nonpayment of fines and fees. Texas has not. For defendants with drug-related convictions, an automatic license suspension creates cascading employment consequences that go well beyond the criminal sentence itself. It makes it harder to get to work, maintain employment, and meet supervision conditions. This reform has not moved in the Texas legislature, but it remains on the reform agenda.
Diversion programs and specialty courts. Texas has expanded the use of specialty courts (ex. drug courts, mental health courts, DWI courts, and veterans’ courts) over the past decade. These courts focus on rehabilitation and supervision rather than incarceration for defendants with underlying substance abuse or mental health issues. They represent a genuine point of alignment between Texas policy and the national reform agenda. For eligible defendants, the availability of a specialty court track can mean the difference between probation with treatment and a prison sentence. Whether a defendant qualifies, and how to advocate for that track, is a strategic decision that should be made with defense counsel from the outset of a case.
Deferred adjudication. Texas already has a well-developed deferred adjudication framework for many criminal offenses. Successfully completing deferred adjudication results in a dismissal rather than a final conviction, and in many cases makes the charge eligible for non-disclosure (sealing). This is a meaningful distinction for defendants: a dismissed case on deferred adjudication has significantly different collateral consequences than a conviction. Understanding which offenses are eligible for deferred adjudication is essential to evaluating available outcomes in any Texas criminal case.
Fines and fees reform. One area where Texas has made incremental progress is reducing the burden of fines and fees on defendants who cannot pay. Texas Appleseed successfully advocated for legislation allowing people who were incarcerated to receive credit toward owed fines and fees based on their time served. This reduces one of the most significant barriers to successful reentry: the accumulation of court debt that can trigger additional warrants, license suspensions, and legal complications for years after a sentence is served.
Case Results
What the Federal Pullback Means for Texas Defendants
The Trump administration’s shift toward stricter federal criminal enforcement has practical implications for Texas defendants, particularly those whose conduct could trigger both state and federal charges.
Federal drug enforcement priorities have shifted toward more aggressive prosecution of fentanyl and synthetic opioid cases. Federal immigration enforcement has increased dramatically, which intersects with the criminal justice system for defendants who are not U.S. citizens. Any criminal conviction, including misdemeanors, can have immigration consequences that must be considered in plea negotiations. Federal civil rights enforcement has also pulled back, which affects defendants who have experienced law enforcement misconduct and were considering civil remedies alongside their criminal defense.
For defendants in the Northern District of Texas (which covers the Dallas-Fort Worth metro, Collin County, and surrounding areas) federal prosecution priorities and the direction of the U.S. Attorney’s office are relevant to understanding the risk of parallel or elevated federal charges in cases involving drug trafficking, firearms, financial crimes, and immigration-related offenses.
What This Means for Defendants Right Now
The honest picture for Texas defendants in 2026 is this: the national reform movement is real, bipartisan, and accelerating. Texas is not leading it. The 2025 legislative session moved in a more punitive direction on bail and added to the list of criminal offenses and enhancements rather than shrinking it. The reforms that do exist in Texas (specialty courts, deferred adjudication, the Windham education program, incremental fines and fees relief) are meaningful, but limited in scope.
What this means practically:
- Diversion programs exist, but require advocacy. Drug courts, mental health courts, and DWI courts are available in most North and Central Texas counties, but defendants do not automatically qualify or get placed. Defense counsel must identify eligibility early and advocate for placement.
- Deferred adjudication eligibility varies by charge. For most criminal offenses, deferred adjudication is a realistic outcome that avoids a final conviction. For DWI, it is not available under any circumstances. Understanding which track is available in your specific case matters from the first court appearance.
- Driver’s license consequences require attention. Drug convictions can trigger automatic license suspensions in Texas. These suspensions compound the consequences of a criminal case in ways that affect employment and compliance with supervision conditions. Addressing the license consequence is part of the complete defense strategy.
- Federal exposure in Texas cases is real. The federal government has increased enforcement in several areas that overlap with state criminal cases. Any case involving drugs, firearms, immigration status, or financial conduct should be evaluated for federal exposure from the outset.
- Reform is a legislative trend, not a trial outcome. The existence of a national reform movement does not change the law that applies in a specific Texas case. What changes case outcomes is the quality of the defense, the strength of the legal arguments, and the experience of the attorneys making them.
If you are facing criminal charges in Texas, contact Deandra Grant Law for a free, confidential consultation. Call (214) 225-7117 or visit texasdwisite.com.
Firm Accolades
Better Business Bureaus
D Magazine
