By Deandra Grant, J.D., M.S. (Pharmaceutical Science), ACS-CHAL Forensic Lawyer-Scientist
Felony murder is one of the most misunderstood charges in Texas criminal law. A person who never intended to kill anyone and who may not have even been the one who caused the death can be charged with murder or capital murder if someone dies during the commission of a felony. The charge can apply to the person who pulled the trigger, the person who drove the getaway car, and the person who stood lookout. Under Texas law, everyone involved in the underlying felony can be held equally responsible for the death.
If you or someone you love is facing a felony murder charge, understanding the two statutory provisions that create this liability, and the critical differences between them, is essential to building an effective defense.
"Deandra Grant Law – Criminal & DWI Defense handled my case with diligence and professionalism. Deandra Grant's reputation is stellar and now I know why. She has a team of individuals who provide quality service."
- N. Coulter
"Deandra Grant Law – Criminal & DWI Defense fights hard for their clients and is always willing to go above and beyond. They are the best firm for DWI cases in DFW and beyond. Definitely hire them to represent you in any pending cases."
- P. Williams
"Deandra Grant made a tough situation so much better. She listened to my concerns and helped me so much with my case. I would recommend her to anyone needing legal services."
- M. Haley
Two Statutes, Two Levels of Felony Murder
Murder Under §19.02(b)(3): The Standard Felony Murder Rule
Under Penal Code §19.02(b)(3), a person commits murder if they commit or attempt to commit a felony, other than manslaughter, and in the course of and in furtherance of the commission or attempt, or in immediate flight from the commission or attempt, they commit or attempt to commit an act clearly dangerous to human life that causes the death of an individual.
The critical distinction: this provision does not require intent to kill. The prosecution must prove that the defendant (1) committed or attempted a felony, (2) committed an act clearly dangerous to human life during or in flight from that felony, and (3) that act caused a death. The “act clearly dangerous to human life” element is what separates this from an accidental death during a felony. The defendant must have done something inherently dangerous, even if they did not intend to kill.
Murder under §19.02(b)(3) is a first-degree felony, punishable by 5 to 99 years or life in prison.
Capital Murder Under §19.03(a)(2): Felony Murder Elevated
Under Penal Code §19.03(a)(2), a person commits capital murder if they intentionally commit murder in the course of committing or attempting to commit kidnapping, burglary, robbery, aggravated sexual assault, arson, obstruction or retaliation, or terroristic threat.
The critical distinction from §19.02(b)(3): capital felony murder under §19.03(a)(2) does require intent to kill. The prosecution must prove that the defendant intentionally caused the death of another person during the commission of one of the enumerated felonies. If the killing was not intentional (i.e. if it was reckless, accidental, or the result of an act dangerous to human life but not intended to kill) the charge should be murder under §19.02(b)(3), not capital murder.
Capital murder is a capital felony, punishable by life without parole or death.
The Intent Gap: The Defense’s Primary Battleground
The difference between §19.02(b)(3) and §19.03(a)(2) is intent to kill. Standard felony murder does not require it. Capital felony murder does. This intent gap is the defense’s most important strategic territory. If the defense can show that the defendant did not intend to kill the victim (that the death was caused by a dangerous act but not by a deliberate killing) the charge should be murder, not capital murder. The difference is the difference between a sentencing range (5–99 years or life, with parole eligibility) and mandatory life without parole or death.
The Law of Parties: §7.02
Felony murder charges are frequently brought against defendants who did not personally cause the death. Under the law of parties (Penal Code §7.02), a person is criminally responsible for an offense committed by another if, acting with intent to promote or assist the commission of the offense, they solicit, encourage, direct, aid, or attempt to aid the other person to commit the offense.
In the felony murder context, this means that if three people commit a robbery and one of them shoots and kills the store clerk, all three can be charged with felony murder, even the two who never touched a weapon. The prosecution’s theory is that the killing was committed “in the course of and in furtherance of” the robbery, and all participants in the robbery are responsible for the foreseeable consequences of the joint criminal enterprise.
Under §7.02(b), there is an additional layer: a person is criminally responsible for another felony committed by a co-conspirator if that felony was committed in furtherance of the conspiracy and should have been anticipated as a result of carrying out the conspiracy. This is the “should have been anticipated” standard, i.e. the prosecution does not have to prove the defendant knew a killing would occur, only that a killing was a foreseeable consequence of the felony they agreed to commit.
The law of parties creates enormous exposure for defendants who participated in a felony but had no involvement in the killing. This is one of the most aggressively prosecuted theories in Texas homicide cases, and it is one of the most important areas for defense challenge.
Defense Strategies in Felony Murder Cases
Challenging the “In the Course Of” Connection
The prosecution must prove that the death occurred “in the course of and in furtherance of” the underlying felony. If the death occurred after the felony was complete and the defendant was no longer in immediate flight, the felony murder rule may not apply. If the death was unrelated to the felony (for example, a co-defendant killed the victim for personal reasons unrelated to the robbery) the connection between the felony and the death may be challenged.
Challenging Intent in Capital Felony Murder
As discussed above, capital murder under §19.03(a)(2) requires intentional killing. The defense can present evidence that the death was not intentional: it was accidental, it resulted from reckless conduct, or it was caused by a co-defendant without the defendant’s knowledge or agreement. If the prosecution cannot prove intent to kill, the charge should be reduced from capital murder to standard felony murder under §19.02(b)(3).
Challenging the Law of Parties
For defendants who did not personally cause the death, the defense can challenge the prosecution’s theory under §7.02. Was the killing truly “in furtherance of” the underlying felony? Did the defendant have any reason to anticipate that a co-defendant would kill someone? Did the defendant attempt to prevent the killing or withdraw from the felony before the death occurred? Evidence of the defendant’s specific role, their communications with co-defendants, and their actions during and after the incident can all be used to challenge party liability.
In 2023, the Texas Legislature passed SB 1601 (effective September 1, 2023), which amended §7.02(b) to require that the defendant “should have anticipated” the felony committed by the co-conspirator. While this standard remains broad, it creates a more defined evidentiary threshold that the defense can challenge. Did the defendant have reason to believe a co-defendant would use deadly force? Was there any prior discussion of weapons or violence? The defendant’s knowledge and expectations are now explicitly relevant.
Case Results
Lesser Included Offenses
Felony murder cases frequently support instructions on lesser included offenses. If the jury is not convinced that the death occurred during the commission of the underlying felony, or if the intent element is not proven, the jury may convict on a lesser charge: manslaughter (§19.04, second-degree felony, 2–20 years), criminally negligent homicide (§19.05, state jail felony, 180 days to 2 years), or the underlying felony itself without the murder charge. Requesting the right combination of lesser included instructions is a critical strategic decision.
Challenging the Underlying Felony
Felony murder requires proof of the underlying felony. If the defense can defeat the underlying felony charge (ex. the robbery, burglary, or aggravated sexual assault) the felony murder charge falls with it. This is sometimes the most effective path: rather than contesting the death or the defendant’s involvement, the defense focuses on proving that the underlying felony was not committed or that the defendant was not a party to it.
Forensic Evidence in Felony Murder Cases
Felony murder prosecutions are heavily evidence-dependent. DNA and fingerprint evidence connects defendants to the scene. Surveillance footage establishes timelines. Cell tower data and GPS records place defendants in proximity to the crime. Digital communications between co-defendants establish the conspiracy and the defendant’s role. Autopsy findings establish the cause of death and may indicate whether the killing was intentional or accidental.
Doug Huff’s ACS-CHAL Forensic Lawyer-Scientist designation and digital forensics training allow him to evaluate forensic evidence from a scientific perspective. In felony murder cases, the forensic evidence often determines not just whether the defendant was involved, but how they were involved and the answer to that question determines whether the charge is capital murder, standard murder, or a lesser offense.
Felony Murder Defense at Deandra Grant Law
Felony murder charges carry some of the most severe consequences in Texas criminal law, and they are among the most complex to defend. The interaction between the felony murder rule, the law of parties, the intent requirements, and the capital/non-capital distinction creates a legal landscape that requires both strategic sophistication and forensic science capability.
At Deandra Grant Law, we defend felony murder cases by attacking the prosecution’s case at every pressure point: the connection between the felony and the death, the intent to kill, the law of parties theory, the forensic evidence, and the underlying felony itself. Our goal is to reduce the charge, reduce the exposure, and achieve the best possible outcome whether that be through negotiation, motion practice, or trial.
With offices in Dallas, Fort Worth, Allen, Denton, Waco, and Rockwall, we defend murder cases across North Texas. Call (214) 225-7117 or visit texasdwisite.com for a confidential consultation.
Firm Accolades
Better Business Bureaus
D Magazine
