Home » Texas Interference with Child Custody Defense Lawyers
Texas Interference with Child Custody Defense Lawyers

Texas Interference with Child Custody Defense Lawyers

With Offices in Dallas, Fort Worth, Allen, Denton, Waco & Rockwall

Do You Need Legal Help?



    Texas Interference with Child Custody Defense Lawyers

    Texas Interference with Child Custody Defense Lawyers

    With Offices in Dallas, Fort Worth, Allen, Denton, Waco & Rockwall

    Do You Need Legal Help?



      "Deandra Grant Law fights hard for their clients and is always willing to go above and beyond. They are the best firm for DWI cases in DFW and beyond. Definitely hire them to represent you in any pending cases."

      - P. Williams

      "Deandra Grant made a tough situation so much better. She listened to my concerns and helped me so much with my case. I would recommend her to anyone needing legal services."

      - M. Haley

      "Deandra Grant Law handled my case with diligence and professionalism. Deandra Grant's reputation is stellar and now I know why. She has a team of individuals who provide quality service."

      - N. Coulter

      As Seen On

      Federal-Book-BG

      Understanding The Federal Criminal Justice System

      Download Our Free Texas Federal Guide

      Learn what you should and shouldn't be doing to help your federal defense case.

      Texas Interference with Child Custody Defense Lawyers

      Custody disputes are among the most emotionally charged legal situations any parent can face. When those disputes cross the line into criminal allegations, the consequences escalate dramatically. Under Texas Penal Code §25.03, a parent or other person who takes or retains a child in violation of a court order commits the offense of interference with child custody — a state jail felony that carries 180 days to 2 years in a state jail facility and a fine of up to $10,000.

      At Deandra Grant Law, Attorney Douglas Huff defends parents and family members against interference with child custody charges.

      What Is Interference with Child Custody?

      • 25.03 provides that a person commits this offense if they take or retain a child younger than 18:
      • When they know that their taking or retention violates the express terms of a judgment or order of a court disposing of the child’s custody
      • When they have not been awarded custody and they know that a suit for divorce or custody has been filed, and they take the child out of the geographic area of the counties composing the judicial district of the court in which the suit is pending

      The offense is a state jail felony. If the defendant takes the child outside the United States, the offense is elevated to a third-degree felony (2 to 10 years in prison).

      Common Scenarios

      Refusing to Return a Child After Visitation

      The most common scenario: a parent keeps a child past the court-ordered return time. This may be a deliberate act of defiance, or it may result from a genuine misunderstanding of the custody order’s terms, a flight delay, a sick child, or a communication breakdown between the parents. Prosecutors frequently charge the criminal offense without investigating the circumstances.

      Relocating with a Child

      A parent who moves with a child to a new city or state without permission from the other parent or approval from the court may be charged with interference with custody. This is particularly common when a parent relocates for a job, to be closer to family, or to leave an unsafe living situation, all of which may be reasonable decisions that the prosecution characterizes as criminal conduct.

      Allegations Driven by Custody Disputes

      In high-conflict custody battles, one parent may file criminal charges against the other as a tactical weapon to gain leverage in the family court proceedings, to damage the other parent’s credibility, or to influence the judge’s custody decision. These cases require careful investigation of the accusing parent’s motivations and the timing of the allegation.

      Recent Blogs

      When the Evidence Is AI-Generated: The Take It Down Act, Section 1466A, and What the Strahler Case Means for Criminal Defense

      By Douglas E. Huff  |  Partner, Deandra Grant Law  |  Dallas, Texas On April 7, [...]

      Arson Convictions, Cameron Todd Willingham, and Texas’s Junk Science Writ

      In late April 2026, The Appeal reported on the appeal of Maria Montalvo, a New [...]

      Daniel Ross: A Frisco Traffic Stop, a Gun and the Hemp-Law Problem

      By Deandra Grant & Griffin Grant Welcome to The Defense File, where we examine the [...]

      Adam “Pacman” Jones: Talent, Trouble, and a Pattern of Charges

      By Deandra Grant & Griffin Grant Welcome to The Defense File, where we examine the [...]

      Can Police Get Into Your iPhone? How Apple’s New Security Is Reshaping Digital Evidence

      By Douglas E. Huff  |  Partner, Deandra Grant Law  |  Dallas, Texas In March 2026, [...]

      The Michael Morton Act, the Richard Miles Act and the Heath Opinion Now Under Fire

      Most people who are not lawyers do not think much about criminal discovery. It sounds [...]

      Pitchford v. Cain: What a Batson Challenge Is, and Why the Jury Is Often Decided Before the First Witness

      By Deandra Grant  |  Deandra Grant Law  |  Dallas, Texas On May 28, 2026, the [...]

      Probabilistic DNA Software in the Courtroom: What Defense Lawyers Need to Watch For

      This month Cybergenetics (the company behind the TrueAllele probabilistic genotyping system) announced the launch of [...]

      Defense Strategies

      • Lack of knowledge. The prosecution must prove the defendant knew their conduct violated the custody order. If the order’s terms were ambiguous, if the defendant misunderstood a provision, or if the defendant relied on the other parent’s verbal agreement to modify the schedule, the knowledge element may not be established.
      • Necessity defense. If the defendant retained the child to protect them from an immediate threat of harm (ex. the other parent was intoxicated, violent, or creating an unsafe environment) the necessity defense may apply.
      • Challenging the custody order. If the custody order relied upon by the prosecution was not properly entered, was not served on the defendant, or does not contain the provisions the prosecution alleges were violated, the charge may fail as a matter of law.
      • De minimis violations. A brief delay in returning a child due to traffic, illness, or reasonable circumstances may not rise to the level of criminal “taking or retaining” under the statute.
      • Investigating the accuser’s motives. Doug investigates whether the criminal complaint was filed as a tactical move in the custody litigation rather than a good-faith report of criminal conduct.

      Protect Your Future — Contact Deandra Grant Law Today

      If you or someone you love is facing criminal charges involving a child in Texas, contact Deandra Grant Law for a free, confidential consultation. Attorney Douglas Huff has defended clients against serious criminal charges throughout his career. Our firm’s forensic science credentials and 30+ years of criminal defense experience mean you get a level of defense that most firms cannot provide.

      Client Reviews

      “Deandra Grant Law – Criminal & DWI Defense handled my case with diligence and professionalism. Deandra Grant’s reputation is stellar and now I know why. She has a team of individuals who provide quality service.”

      N. Coulter

      Read More Reviews

       

      (214) 225-7117
      Experienced DWI Defense

      Do You Need Legal Help?