Criminal Defense Charge

Texas Probation Violation Defense Lawyer

The Short Answer

Deandra Grant Law - Criminal & DWI Defense defends probation violation allegations that risk revocation and jail time.

A probation violation hearing is one of the most misunderstood proceedings in the Texas criminal justice system. Most defendants assume that because they are not charged with a new crime, the procedural protections that apply in a criminal trial also apply at a revocation hearing. They do not. The state does not have to prove a probation violation beyond a reasonable doubt. The standard is preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not). There is no right to a jury. The judge decides. And the consequence of a finding of violation can be incarceration for the full original sentence, which may be years that were suspended when probation was granted.

Understanding the procedural differences between a probation revocation hearing and a criminal trial is the starting point for building an effective defense. Deandra Grant Law has defended probation violation proceedings across North and Central Texas for more than 30 years.

Consequences of Violating Probation in Texas
Probation Violation Defense in Texas

How Texas Probation Works: Community Supervision

In Texas, probation is formally called community supervision. It is governed by . Community supervision can be granted by a judge following a conviction (straight probation) or as a condition of deferred adjudication which is where the judge withholds a finding of guilt while the defendant completes supervision.

The distinction between straight probation and deferred adjudication matters significantly at a revocation hearing. A defendant on straight probation who is revoked has already been convicted. The judge imposes the sentence that was suspended. A defendant on deferred adjudication who is revoked has their case adjudicated and the judge enters a finding of guilt and then assesses punishment. For deferred adjudication on certain offenses, the judge has access to the full punishment range, not just the suspended sentence that would apply on straight probation.

 

What Constitutes a Probation Violation

A probation violation is any alleged failure to comply with the conditions of community supervision set by the court. Common violations include:

  • Failure to report. Missing a scheduled meeting with the probation officer. One of the most common technical violations and often the result of transportation, employment, or communication difficulties rather than deliberate non-compliance.
  • Positive drug or alcohol test. Testing positive for a prohibited substance. The reliability of the testing methodology, the chain of custody for the specimen, and whether the positive result can be explained by a prescribed medication are all subject to challenge.
  • Failure to pay fines, court costs, or restitution. Under , 461 U.S. 660 (1983), a court cannot revoke probation for failure to pay if the defendant made bona fide efforts to pay and the failure was due to circumstances beyond their control. Inability to pay is a defense to revocation for non-payment.
  • Commission of a new offense. An arrest for a new criminal offense can trigger a revocation motion even before the new charge is resolved. An arrest is not a conviction. The state still must establish the violation at the revocation hearing, and the outcome of the new charge affects the revocation proceedings.
  • Failure to complete required programs. Missing counseling sessions, failing to complete community service hours, or not completing an anger management or substance abuse program.
  • Violation of travel restrictions. Leaving the county or state without authorization from the probation officer or the court.
  • Contact with prohibited persons. In family violence, sex offense, or other cases with no-contact conditions, any contact with the prohibited person can constitute a violation regardless of who initiated contact.

 

The Revocation Hearing: Procedure and Burden of Proof

A motion to revoke community supervision is filed by the state and served on the defendant. The defendant is entitled to a hearing before the judge who imposed the supervision, or another judge if that judge is unavailable. The defendant has the right to be represented by counsel and the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses.

The burden of proof is preponderance of the evidence. The state must show it is more likely than not that the violation occurred. This is materially lower than the beyond a reasonable doubt standard that applies in a criminal trial. Evidence that would be insufficient to support a conviction may be sufficient to support a revocation.

The judge, not a jury, decides whether the violation occurred and what the consequence will be. If the court finds a violation, it has several options: it can continue the supervision with modified conditions, extend the period of supervision, impose a period of jail as a condition of continued supervision (a “shock” sanction), or revoke supervision entirely and impose the sentence.

The Motion to Adjudicate in deferred adjudication cases follows the same procedural framework but carries a different consequence. If the court adjudicates guilt, it then conducts a punishment hearing and can assess any sentence within the applicable punishment range for the original offense, which may be significantly more severe than the originally suspended sentence in a straight probation case.

 

Early Termination of Community Supervision

permits the court to terminate community supervision early if the defendant has completed at least one-third of the supervision period (or two years, whichever is less), has paid all fines and restitution, and has otherwise complied with the conditions of supervision. Early termination discharges the supervision and, for deferred adjudication cases, permits the defendant to seek non-disclosure of the record.

If you are currently on community supervision and have maintained compliance, evaluating eligibility for early termination is a proactive step that should be considered rather than waiting for a violation motion that could put the entire case at risk.

 

Why Deandra Grant Law

  • 30+ years of criminal defense across North and Central Texas. 500+ trials to verdict. Probation violation hearings are an area of active practice, not an occasional matter.
  • Full understanding of the deferred adjudication vs. straight probation distinction. The consequence of revocation differs significantly between the two, and the defense strategy must account for that distinction.
  • Mitigation presentation at the disposition phase. Winning at the violation phase is the goal. When that is not achievable, the disposition hearing is where incarceration can still be avoided or minimized.
  • Texas Super Lawyer since 2011. AV® Preeminent rated by Martindale-Hubbell®.
  • Offices in Dallas, Fort Worth, Allen, Denton, Waco, and Rockwall. North and Central Texas courts served directly.

 

If you are facing a probation violation motion in Texas, call (214) 225-7117 for a free, confidential case review. Or schedule online at texasdwisite.com/schedule-consultation.

Case Results

Dismissed2026

Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon

Aggravated assault with a deadly weapon charges dropped

Dismissed2026

Family Violence Assault

Family violence assault charge dismissed

Dismissed2026

Unlawfully Carrying a Weapon

Unlawfully carrying a weapon charge dismissed

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is decided on its own facts.

All Case Results

4.9 out of 5 across 613 reviews

★★★★★

Deandra grant law helped me when no other law firm would take on my case. I was hit with no bonds for several charges while on probation in…

JJ
James Jordan
Read All Reviews

Where We Defend These Cases

Which county your case is filed in changes how it is charged, who prosecutes it, and which court hears it. Each market page covers that courthouse.

Deandra M. Grant
Written & Reviewed By

Deandra M. Grant, JD, GC, MS, ACS-CHAL Forensic Lawyer-Scientist

She holds a Master of Science in Pharmaceutical Science and a Graduate Certificate in Forensic Toxicology, both from the University of Florida. She is the author of The Texas DWI Manual and has defended Texas DWI cases since 1994.

Full profile and credentials →

Your Defense Starts Now

Facing Criminal Charges in Texas?

The sooner a defense lawyer is involved, the more can be done to protect your record and your freedom. Talk to us today.

No Cost · No Obligation

Request a Free Case Evaluation

Tell us what happened. We'll respond as soon as possible.