Firm Accolades
Better Business Bureaus
D Magazine
Examining the Legality of Searches and Seizures
One of the first areas a defense team will likely investigate is how the evidence was collected. In drug cases, law enforcement officers must follow specific rules when searching someone’s property or belongings. The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures, meaning that police need a valid reason, such as a warrant or probable cause, to search someone’s home, vehicle, or even their person. If law enforcement conducts a search without a warrant or fails to follow the proper procedures, the evidence they collect may be considered “inadmissible” in court, which means it cannot be used against the accused. A defense strategy may include questioning the police’s actions leading up to the search. For example, if an officer stopped a person without reasonable suspicion, then any evidence found during that stop may be challenged in court. Police officers must have clear reasons, such as witnessing illegal activity or receiving reliable information about a crime, to stop someone and conduct a search. If they lack this justification, the evidence may be dismissed. This approach requires a careful review of police reports, witness statements, and any video footage, if available, to understand whether officers overstepped their boundaries during the search and seizure process.
Managing Partner
Partner & Criminal Division Chief
Criminal Trial Division
Criminal Trial Division
Associate Attorney
Of Counsel
Questioning Chain of Custody Procedures
In drug possession cases, the state must prove that the evidence presented in court is the same as what was seized from the accused. This is done through a process known as the “chain of custody,” which is a detailed record of who handled the evidence from the time it was collected until it appears in the courtroom. Any break in this chain, such as evidence being left unattended or incorrectly documented, can raise questions about its authenticity. If the defense can show that the evidence may have been tampered with or mishandled, it could lead to doubts about its reliability. The chain of custody requires careful documentation, so any mistakes or gaps could weaken the state’s case. Defense attorneys often request detailed records of how evidence was stored, transported, and presented. For instance, if the heroin in question was left in an unsealed container, or if it went unaccounted for during transport, these are points the defense can argue. By exposing these errors, the defense may be able to convince the court that the evidence is too unreliable to be used, ultimately strengthening the accused’s position.
"Deandra Grant Law – Criminal & DWI Defense handled my case with diligence and professionalism. Deandra Grant's reputation is stellar and now I know why. She has a team of individuals who provide quality service."
- N. Coulter
"Deandra Grant Law – Criminal & DWI Defense fights hard for their clients and is always willing to go above and beyond. They are the best firm for DWI cases in DFW and beyond. Definitely hire them to represent you in any pending cases."
- P. Williams
"Deandra Grant made a tough situation so much better. She listened to my concerns and helped me so much with my case. I would recommend her to anyone needing legal services."
- M. Haley
Disputing the Reliability of Field Tests and Laboratory Analysis
Another common strategy is to challenge the tests used to identify the substance as heroin. In many cases, police use field tests to get quick results. However, these tests are not always reliable and can sometimes yield false positives, meaning they can wrongly indicate a drug’s presence. Simple errors in handling or interpreting these tests may cause inaccuracies, so they are not considered foolproof. A defense team might investigate the type of test used, the officer’s training, and whether the test was administered correctly. Lab tests conducted later are usually more accurate than field tests, but they are not immune to error. Lab technicians must follow strict protocols, and any mishandling of samples or faulty equipment could produce inaccurate results. The defense may look into the credentials of the lab personnel, the condition of the lab, and the equipment used. If any of these factors show signs of negligence or error, the defense might argue that the results cannot be trusted. Questioning the reliability of drug tests can create doubt in the prosecution’s case, as accurate identification is a crucial part of proving possession.Arguing Lack of Possession or Knowledge
For a heroin possession charge to stand, the state must prove that the accused knowingly had the drug in their possession. Sometimes, the defense can argue that the person did not actually possess or know about the heroin. For example, if drugs are found in a shared vehicle or residence, it may not be clear who owns them. In these situations, the defense might assert that the accused had no knowledge of the drug’s presence. Without clear proof of knowledge or control, the prosecution’s case becomes harder to uphold.Related Videos
Judge or Jury Trial?
Choosing a Criminal Defense Attorney