Of all the charges the federal government brings against defendants in Texas, conspiracy may be the most misunderstood—and the most dangerous. A federal conspiracy charge does not require that you actually committed the underlying crime. It does not require that the crime was ever completed. All the government needs to prove is that you agreed with one or more other people to commit a federal offense and that someone in the group took at least one overt act in furtherance of that agreement.
This means you can be convicted of conspiracy even if the planned crime never happened. Even if you changed your mind. Even if your role was minor. And because of the way federal conspiracy law works, you can be held responsible for the actions of your co-conspirators—people you may barely know—under a legal doctrine that makes every member of the conspiracy liable for the foreseeable acts of every other member.
At Deandra Grant Law, we have defended clients charged with federal conspiracy in courts across Texas. These are complex, high-stakes cases that require a defense team with deep experience in federal law. Here is what you need to know.
"Deandra Grant Law – Criminal & DWI Defense handled my case with diligence and professionalism. Deandra Grant's reputation is stellar and now I know why. She has a team of individuals who provide quality service."
- N. Coulter
"Deandra Grant Law – Criminal & DWI Defense fights hard for their clients and is always willing to go above and beyond. They are the best firm for DWI cases in DFW and beyond. Definitely hire them to represent you in any pending cases."
- P. Williams
"Deandra Grant made a tough situation so much better. She listened to my concerns and helped me so much with my case. I would recommend her to anyone needing legal services."
- M. Haley
The Federal Conspiracy Statute: 18 U.S.C. § 371
The general federal conspiracy statute is 18 U.S.C. § 371. It prohibits two types of conspiracy: conspiracy to commit a federal offense, and conspiracy to defraud the United States. The maximum penalty under § 371 is five years in federal prison, unless the underlying offense is a misdemeanor, in which case the maximum penalty is the same as the misdemeanor itself.
However, many federal offenses have their own specific conspiracy provisions that carry much harsher penalties. Federal drug conspiracy under 21 U.S.C. § 846 carries the same penalties as the underlying drug offense—which means a drug conspiracy conviction can result in mandatory minimum sentences of five, ten, or even twenty years in federal prison depending on the type and quantity of drugs involved. RICO conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) carries up to twenty years. Conspiracy to commit money laundering under 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h) carries up to twenty years.
The government chooses which conspiracy statute to charge based on the facts of the case, and that choice has enormous implications for the defendant’s potential sentence.
What the Government Must Prove
To secure a conviction for federal conspiracy, the government must prove three elements beyond a reasonable doubt.
First, there must be an agreement between two or more people to commit a federal crime or to defraud the United States. The agreement does not have to be formal or written. It does not have to be explicit. The government can prove the existence of an agreement through circumstantial evidence—phone records, financial transactions, patterns of behavior, testimony from cooperating witnesses. Prosecutors will argue that the agreement can be inferred from the conduct of the parties.
Second, the defendant must have knowingly and voluntarily joined the conspiracy. The government must show that the defendant knew about the conspiracy’s objectives and intentionally participated. Mere association with people who happen to be involved in criminal activity is not enough. Mere presence at the scene of a crime is not enough. But the government often stretches these principles to their limits.
Third, at least one member of the conspiracy must have committed an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy. An overt act can be almost anything—making a phone call, traveling to a meeting, purchasing supplies, transferring money. It does not have to be illegal in itself. Note that drug conspiracy under 21 U.S.C. § 846 does not even require an overt act—the agreement alone is sufficient for conviction.
Managing Partner
Partner & Criminal Division Chief
Criminal Trial Division
Criminal Trial Division
Associate Attorney
Of Counsel
The Pinkerton Doctrine: Liability for Others’ Actions
One of the most dangerous aspects of federal conspiracy law is the Pinkerton doctrine, named after the Supreme Court’s 1946 decision in Pinkerton v. United States. Under Pinkerton, every member of a conspiracy can be held criminally liable for the substantive crimes committed by any other member of the conspiracy, as long as those crimes were committed in furtherance of the conspiracy and were reasonably foreseeable.
In practical terms, this means that if you agreed to participate in a drug distribution network—even in a minor role—and one of your co-conspirators committed a murder during a drug deal gone wrong, you could be charged with that murder under the Pinkerton doctrine if the government argues that violence was a foreseeable consequence of the drug conspiracy.
This is how federal conspiracy charges can turn a relatively minor player into someone facing decades in prison. It is one of the most powerful tools in the federal prosecutor’s arsenal, and defending against Pinkerton liability requires a sophisticated understanding of federal conspiracy law.
How Federal Conspiracy Cases Are Built
Federal conspiracy cases in Texas are typically built over long periods through a combination of investigative techniques. Wiretaps capture conversations between alleged co-conspirators. Financial records trace the movement of money. Confidential informants provide testimony about the conspiracy’s structure and objectives. And most importantly, cooperating co-defendants provide testimony in exchange for reduced sentences.
This last point is critical. In multi-defendant federal conspiracy cases, the government’s strategy is almost always to flip lower-level participants against higher-level targets. The government will offer cooperation agreements—typically requiring the cooperating defendant to plead guilty, provide truthful testimony, and sometimes wear a recording device—in exchange for a motion under § 5K1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines or 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e), which allows the court to sentence below the mandatory minimum.
The incentive for cooperating witnesses to testify favorably for the government is enormous. A defendant facing a twenty-year mandatory minimum has powerful motivation to say whatever the government wants to hear. This is why cooperating witness testimony must be challenged aggressively at trial—their testimony is inherently suspect because of the benefits they receive.
Case Results
Common Federal Conspiracy Charges in Texas
The most common federal conspiracy charges we see in Texas courts include drug conspiracy under 21 U.S.C. § 846, which is overwhelmingly the most frequently charged federal conspiracy offense in the Northern District of Texas and the Southern District of Texas. Texas’s proximity to the Mexican border and its position as a major drug trafficking corridor make drug conspiracy cases a priority for federal prosecutors throughout the state.
Fraud conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 371 covers conspiracies to commit wire fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud, healthcare fraud, and other federal fraud offenses. These cases often involve complex financial transactions and can target business owners, healthcare providers, and financial professionals.
RICO conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) is used against alleged criminal organizations and enterprises. RICO conspiracy charges allow the government to tie together diverse criminal activities under a single theory of an ongoing criminal enterprise.
Money laundering conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h) targets those who allegedly conspired to conceal the proceeds of criminal activity. These charges are frequently paired with drug conspiracy charges.
Defenses to Federal Conspiracy Charges
Despite the breadth of federal conspiracy law, there are legitimate defenses. The defense may challenge the existence of an agreement, arguing that the government has failed to prove that a genuine conspiracy existed as opposed to mere association or parallel conduct. The defense may challenge the defendant’s knowledge and intent, arguing that the defendant did not know about the conspiracy’s criminal objectives. The defense may argue withdrawal—that the defendant affirmatively withdrew from the conspiracy before the commission of any overt act, and took steps to disavow the conspiracy’s objectives.
Additionally, the defense can challenge the reliability of cooperating witness testimony, the legality of wiretaps and surveillance, the sufficiency of the evidence linking the defendant to the alleged conspiracy, and the scope of the conspiracy itself—arguing that the government has improperly lumped together what are actually separate, smaller conspiracies into one overarching conspiracy to increase penalties.
At Deandra Grant Law, we bring forensic science credentials, trial experience, and deep knowledge of federal law to every conspiracy case we handle. Our ACS-CHAL Forensic Lawyer-Scientist designation means we can challenge the government’s scientific evidence—drug analysis, financial forensics, digital evidence—at a level that most defense attorneys cannot.
Facing Federal Criminal Charges in Texas? Contact Deandra Grant Law Today.
If you or someone you love is facing a federal criminal investigation or federal charges in Texas, time is not on your side. The federal government has already been building its case. You need a defense team that understands how the federal system works and has the experience to fight back.
At Deandra Grant Law, our attorneys include ACS-CHAL Forensic Lawyer-Scientists, published legal scholars, and former public defenders who have tried hundreds of cases across Texas. We handle federal criminal matters in the Northern District of Texas, the Eastern District of Texas, the Western District of Texas, and the Southern District of Texas.
Call us at (214) 225-7117 or schedule a free consultation at texasdwisite.com/schedule-an-appointment/. Se habla español: (972) 347-8833.
The defense is ready.
Firm Accolades
Better Business Bureaus
D Magazine
