Firm Accolades
D Magazine
What Are the Federal Sentencing Guidelines? 
The Federal Sentencing Guidelines are a set of rules developed by the U.S. Sentencing Commission to ensure uniformity in sentencing across federal criminal cases. These guidelines provide a range of sentences based on the specific offense and the defendant’s criminal history. The goal is to ensure that individuals convicted of similar crimes receive similar sentences. Factors such as the severity of the offense, any previous convictions, and whether any aggravating or mitigating circumstances apply are all considered in determining the sentence.
The guidelines are used as a reference point for judges to calculate an appropriate sentence. However, they are not absolute. A judge can depart from the guidelines if there are specific reasons, such as the defendant’s role in the offense or cooperation with authorities.
How Do the Federal Sentencing Guidelines Impact Your Case?
Federal Sentencing Guidelines can significantly affect the outcome of your case. The guidelines use a point system that evaluates several factors, including the nature of the crime, whether the defendant has prior criminal history, and other variables that can influence the sentence length. For example, if you’re convicted of a drug offense, the amount of drugs involved will play a critical role in determining the sentencing range. While the guidelines provide a starting point, the sentence can still vary based on factors unique to your case. Federal judges are required to consider the guidelines but are also allowed to exercise discretion. This means that a skilled defense attorney may be able to argue for a lesser sentence, depending on the circumstances.
Managing Partner
Partner & Criminal Division Chief
Criminal Trial Division
Criminal Trial Division
Of Counsel
Aggravating and Mitigating Factors
In some cases, aggravating or mitigating factors may be used to adjust a sentence beyond the guidelines. Aggravating factors are conditions that increase the severity of the sentence. For example, if a firearm was used in the commission of a crime or if the defendant was particularly violent, the judge may impose a harsher sentence. On the other hand, mitigating factors can reduce the sentence. These might include the defendant’s cooperation with law enforcement, their lack of a criminal history, or their efforts to make restitution for the crime. For example, a defendant who has shown remorse for their actions and is actively seeking rehabilitation may receive a more lenient sentence.The Role of Plea Bargains and Departures
In many federal criminal cases, defendants and prosecutors may enter into plea bargains. Plea bargaining involves the defendant agreeing to plead guilty to a lesser charge in exchange for a reduced sentence. The Federal Sentencing Guidelines provide a structured framework that makes it easier for both parties to negotiate plea agreements. However, the defendant’s sentence may still be influenced by the factors that are considered in the guidelines. Additionally, defense attorneys can argue for a departure from the sentencing guidelines. If there are unique circumstances in the defendant’s life, such as mental health issues or a history of trauma, an attorney may be able to argue for a reduced sentence based on those factors. In some cases, judges will approve a departure from the guidelines if the defendant’s situation justifies it.
"Deandra Grant Law – Criminal & DWI Defense handled my case with diligence and professionalism. Deandra Grant's reputation is stellar and now I know why. She has a team of individuals who provide quality service."
- N. Coulter
"Deandra Grant Law – Criminal & DWI Defense fights hard for their clients and is always willing to go above and beyond. They are the best firm for DWI cases in DFW and beyond. Definitely hire them to represent you in any pending cases."
- P. Williams
"Deandra Grant made a tough situation so much better. She listened to my concerns and helped me so much with my case. I would recommend her to anyone needing legal services."
- M. Haley
Judicial Discretion in Sentencing
While the Federal Sentencing Guidelines are meant to create consistency, judges still have discretion in sentencing. The guidelines provide a sentencing range based on specific offense characteristics, but judges are not bound by these ranges. If a judge believes that the recommended sentence is too harsh or too lenient based on the specific circumstances of the case, they may adjust the sentence accordingly. Judicial discretion allows the judge to consider factors that are not accounted for in the guidelines, such as the defendant’s personal history, character, or motivations behind the crime. For example, if a defendant committed a crime under duress or was acting out of self-defense, the judge may choose a more lenient sentence than the one recommended by the guidelines.What to Expect During the Sentencing Hearing
During the sentencing hearing, the judge will review the details of your case, including the offense and any relevant aggravating or mitigating factors. Both the defense and the prosecution will present arguments. The prosecution may argue for a sentence at the higher end of the sentencing range, while the defense will present arguments to secure a more lenient sentence.Related Videos
Biggest Mistakes of a DWI Charge
Choosing a Personal Injury Attorney