Do You Need Legal Help?
"Deandra Grant Law fights hard for their clients and is always willing to go above and beyond. They are the best firm for DWI cases in DFW and beyond. Definitely hire them to represent you in any pending cases."
- P. Williams
"Deandra Grant made a tough situation so much better. She listened to my concerns and helped me so much with my case. I would recommend her to anyone needing legal services."
- M. Haley
"Deandra Grant Law handled my case with diligence and professionalism. Deandra Grant's reputation is stellar and now I know why. She has a team of individuals who provide quality service."
- N. Coulter
As Seen On
Collin County Criminal Courts Guide
By Attorney Deandra Grant
If you’re facing a criminal charge in Collin County, understanding how the local courts work can make the process far less confusing. This guide explains where cases are heard, what each court handles, and what you can expect as your case moves through the system.
Read NowMcKinney Theft Defense Lawyers
Theft charges in Collin County are prosecuted by the Collin County District Attorney’s Office and heard in the District Courts at the Collin County Courthouse, 2100 Bloomdale Road, McKinney, TX 75071. The charge level and penalty range are determined almost entirely by the value of the property alleged to have been stolen. Texas significantly updated those value thresholds in 2016, raising them across the board. Many penalty descriptions published online still reflect the pre-2016 numbers, which are wrong.
Deandra Grant Law has defended theft charges in Collin County for more than 30 years. The intent element, the value evidence, and the lawfulness of the search are where these cases are defended.
Texas Theft Penalty Structure — Current Law (Post-HB 1396, Effective January 1, 2016)
Texas Penal Code §31.03 defines theft and establishes the value-based penalty ladder. The following thresholds have been in effect since January 1, 2016:
- Less than $100: Class C misdemeanor — fine only, up to $500.
- $100 to less than $750: Class B misdemeanor — up to 180 days in county jail, fine up to $2,000.
- $750 to less than $2,500: Class A misdemeanor — up to 1 year in county jail, fine up to $4,000.
- $2,500 to less than $30,000: State jail felony — 180 days to 2 years in state jail, fine up to $10,000.
- $30,000 to less than $150,000: Third-degree felony — 2 to 10 years in TDCJ, fine up to $10,000.
- $150,000 to less than $300,000: Second-degree felony — 2 to 20 years in TDCJ, fine up to $10,000.
- $300,000 or more: First-degree felony — 5 to 99 years or life in TDCJ, fine up to $10,000.
Enhancements that can elevate the charge level regardless of value: theft from a person 65 years of age or older is enhanced one penalty level. Theft by a public servant from assets under their custody is also enhanced. Prior theft convictions can be aggregated with the current charge to reach a higher value threshold.
McKinney Criminal & DWI Defense
Criminal Defense Assault Boating While Intoxicated Cocaine Defense Drug Crimes DUID DWI Felony DWI Gun Crimes Intoxication Assault Theft Defense Warrants
Related Videos
Defense Strategies in Collin County Theft Cases
The intent element. Theft requires proof that the defendant intended to deprive the owner of the property. Mistake (ex. genuinely forgetting to pay, accidentally walking out with merchandise, or misunderstanding the terms of a transaction) negates the intent element. A defendant who had a good-faith belief that they had a right to the property may have a claim of right defense. These are legitimate legal arguments, not admissions of wrongdoing.
The value evidence. The prosecution must prove the value of the property meets the threshold for the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt. “Value” under Texas law is the fair market value at the time and place of the offense and not necessarily the retail price. For damaged or used goods, the replacement value may be lower than what the prosecution claims. The value calculation is a factual issue subject to challenge.
Consent and authorization. Appropriation is not unlawful if the owner consented or if the defendant reasonably believed the owner consented. In employee theft cases involving ambiguous authorization, the consent defense is frequently raised.
Article 38.23. Texas’s exclusionary rule carries no good faith exception. In theft cases involving warrantless searches of vehicles, bags, or persons, evidence obtained through an unlawful search is suppressible. Without the physical evidence of the allegedly stolen property, the prosecution frequently cannot prove its case.
Digital and surveillance evidence. Theft cases increasingly involve surveillance footage, transaction records, and access logs. This evidence must be properly authenticated and provided in complete, unedited form. Douglas Huff’s digital forensics training covers the authentication, chain of custody, and technical evaluation of digital evidence at the data level.
Related Blogs
When the Video Might Be a Lie: How Texas Defense Lawyers Are Fighting Deepfake-Era Evidence
For decades, a grainy surveillance clip or a damning social-media video was close to game-over [...]
What Counts as ‘Reasonable Suspicion’? A Plain-English Guide to the Supreme Court’s Latest Fourth Amendment Ruling
On April 20, 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in District of [...]
Bite Marks, Hair Analysis, and the Science Courts Are Still Admitting
In 2016, the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) published a detailed [...]
Cold Cases and the Fourth Amendment: What Genetic Genealogy Means for Defendants
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier announced this week a $600,000 partnership with Othram (a Texas-based [...]
When Drug Distribution Becomes a Homicide Case: Lessons from the Matthew Perry Sentencing
On April 8, 2026, U.S. District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett sentenced Jasveen Sangha (the Los [...]
Criminal Justice Reform in 2026: What It Means for Texas Defendants
National headlines about criminal justice reform in 2026 tell a story of accelerating bipartisan progress [...]
How Do Police Track Your Online Activity And Can That Evidence Be Challenged?
Law enforcement agencies have increasingly sophisticated tools for monitoring and documenting internet activity. They can [...]
What to Do if You’re Falsely Accused of Sexual Assault in Texas
Few things are more terrifying than being accused of something you did not do and [...]
Deferred Adjudication: Available for Theft
Deferred adjudication community supervision is available for most theft offenses. A defendant who successfully completes the conditions of deferred adjudication (typically a supervision period, fines, and restitution) receives a dismissal rather than a final conviction. The charge then becomes eligible for non-disclosure (sealing) in most circumstances. For first-time defendants, deferred adjudication is often the most important tool in minimizing the long-term consequences of a theft charge.
Why Deandra Grant Law for McKinney Theft Defense
- Office in Allen. 30+ years in Collin County courts. 500+ trials to verdict. The Collin County Courthouse in McKinney and the Collin County DA’s office are familiar ground.
- Article 38.23 — no good faith exception. Every theft case begins with the lawfulness of the search or seizure that produced the evidence.
- Digital forensics training — Douglas Huff. Surveillance footage, digital transaction records, and access logs evaluated at the technical level.
- 17 published law books. Including A First Offender’s Guide to Texas Criminal Courts
- Texas Super Lawyer since 2011. AV® Preeminent rated by Martindale-Hubbell®.
If you are facing theft charges in Collin County, call (214) 225-7117 for a free, confidential consultation. Or schedule online at texasdwisite.com.
Client Reviews
“Deandra Grant Law – Criminal & DWI Defense handled my case with diligence and professionalism. Deandra Grant’s reputation is stellar and now I know why. She has a team of individuals who provide quality service.”